2.
Response
to
Comments
2.8
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
Within
one
week
following
completion
of
pile
driving
activities,
a
post-
construction
assessment
of
all
underground
utilities
within
30
feet
of
the
pile
driving
activity
shall
be
submitted
to
the
City
by
the
contractor,
confirming
that
no
damage
to
any
underground
utilities
occurred
as
the
result
of
the
pile
driving
activity.
Should
the
post-construction
assessment
determine
that
underground
utilities
were
damaged
by
pile
driving
activities,
such
damage
shall
be
repaired
by
the
contractor
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
City
and
affected
utility.
As
stated
on
Draft
EIR
pages
4.O-44
through
4.O-47,
the
proposed
recycled
water
plant
is
anticipated
to
be
in
operation
by
year
15
in
the
development
buildout
schedule
and,
once
fully
operational,
would
treat
most
of
the
liquid
waste
component
of
wastewater
produced
by
Project
Site
development.
The
remaining
liquid
and
solid
waste
would
be
discharged
into
the
Bayshore
Sanitary
District
and
eventually
the
SFPUC
wastewater
collection
system
for
treatment.
The
recycled
water
plant
would,
therefore,
significantly
reduce
wastewater
flows
to
the
SFPUC
collection
and
treatment
system
to
levels
well
below
the
maximum
wastewater
flows
allowed
by
the
City
of
Brisbane’s
contract
for
dry
weather
flows
with
the
SFPUC.
Details
regarding
the
effect
of
hydraulics
on
the
SFPUC
wastewater
collection
system
will
be
coordinated
between
the
City,
BSD,
and
SFPUC
as
part
of
recycled
water
plant
engineering
design.
As
discussed
1,
the
proposed
project
analyzed
in
the
Baylands
EIR
consists
of
four
development
scenarios
analyzed
at
an
equal
level
of
detail,
a
General
Plan
Amendment,
and
a
Specific
Plan
proposed
for
two
of
the
four
proposed
scenarios
(DSP,
DSP-V).
No
site-specific
development
is
proposed
at
this
time,
and
operational
details
of
the
proposed
water
supply
transfers
have
not
yet
been
determined.
As
stated
in
additional,
project-level
CEQA
review
of
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer
agreement
would
be
required
prior
to
its
consideration
by
the
City
once
operational
details
as
to
how
the
transfer
would
be
implemented
through
MID
and
the
SFPUC
are
determined
in
cooperation
with
OID,
MID,
and
the
SFPUC.
At
that
time,
a
project-level
CEQA
review
would
be
undertaken
to
evaluate
the
proposed
operations
based
on
the
types
and
intensity
of
uses
determined
to
be
appropriate
by
the
City
of
Brisbane
for
the
Baylands.
The
project-level
CEQA
review
would
include
detailed
modeling
of
conveyance
through
the
OID,
MID,
and
SFPUC
systems,
recognizing
the
conveyance
capacity
of
each
agency
to
move
the
transfer
water
from
OID
to
Brisbane.
The
project-level
CEQA
evaluation
would
address
in
detail
potential
effects
on
the
SFPUC’s
diversions,
storage,
and
operations.
Such
project
-level
environmental
analysis
would
be
based
on
the
specific
development
scenario
or
alternative
selected
by
the
City
of
Brisbane
for
the
Baylands,
and
would
therefore
provide
for
analysis
based
on
a
more
specific
understanding
of
future
land
uses
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.8.3-27
May
2015