2.
Response
to
Comments
2.8
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Municipalities
and
water
demand
than
is
possible
at
the
present
time.
The
SFPUC
would
rely
on
such
project-level
CEQA
evaluation,
rather
than
the
current
program
EIR,
as
part
of
its
approval
process
for
consideration
of
the
agreements
into
which
it
must
enter
to
implement
its
role
in
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer
to
Brisbane.
SFPUC-7
[See
page
5-78
for
the
original
comment]
The
Draft
EIR
provides
program-
level
evaluation
of
proposed
development
and
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer.
See
Master Response
1
for
discussion
of
the
programmatic
nature
of
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Draft
EIR.
Also,
see
Response
SFPUC-6
for
discussion
of
subsequent
project-level
CEQA
review
that
will
be
conducted
for
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer.
[See page
5-78 for the original comment]
This
comment
is
prefaced
by
the
phrase,
“If
the
analysis
in
this
Draft
EIR
is
intended
to
provide
a
project
level
analysis
to
allow
agencies
to
rely
on
it
to
perform
actions
of
entering
into
water
supply
agreements
the
following
items
should
be
addressed:”
The
Brisbane
Baylands
EIR
is
a
program
EIR
that
is
not
intended
to
provide
project-level
analysis
regarding
the
proposed
water
supply
agreement.
See
Master
Response
1
for
discussion
of
the
programmatic
nature
of
the
Brisbane
Baylands
Draft
EIR.
See
Response
SFPUC-6
for
discussion
of
subsequent
project-level
CEQA
review
that
will
be
conducted
for
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer.
Please
also
see
Master Response 29
for
discussion
of
the
environmental
effects
of
the
proposed
OID
transfer
discussed
in
the
Draft
EIR
and
for
an
outline
of
the
issues
to
be
re-
evaluated
in
greater
detail
in
a
subsequent,
project-level
CEQA
document
evaluating
the
proposed
water
transfer.
[See
page
5-79
for
the
original
comment]
The
proposed
project
analyzed
in
the
Baylands
EIR
consists
of
four
development
scenarios
analyzed
at
an
equal
level
of
detail,
a
General
Plan
Amendment,
and
a
Specific
Plan
proposed
for
two
of
the
four
proposed
scenarios
(DSP,
DSP-V).
No
site-specific
development
is
proposed
at
this
time.
As
discussed
in
Master
Response
1,
subsequent
site-
specific
development,
including
operational
details
of
the
proposed
water
supply
transfers
will
be
subject
to
project-level
environmental
analysis
and
subsequent
CEQA
documentation.
See
Response SFPUC-6
for
discussion
of
subsequent
project-level
CEQA
review
that
will
be
conducted
for
the
proposed
OID
water
transfer.
Please
see
Master
Response
29
for
discussion
of
the
environmental
effects
of
the
proposed
OID
transfer
discussed
in
the
Draft
EIR
and
for
an
outline
of
the
issues
to
be
re-evaluated
in
greater
detail
in
a
subsequent,
project-level
CEQA
document
for
the
proposed
water
transfer.
[See page
5-79 for the original comment]
As
noted
in
Comment
SFPUC-10,
the
SFPUC
is
actively
developing
a
mitigation
measure
identified
in
its
WSIP
PEIR
(San
Francisco
Planning
Department,
2008)
to
implement
controlled
releases
from
Hetch
Hetchy
Reservoir
to
address
the
impacts
on
downstream
SFPUC-8
SFPUC-9
SFPUC-10
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.8.3-28
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page