2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
See
See
for
discussion
of
the
requirements
imposed
by
the
Draft
EIR
for
vapor
intrusion
barriers.
See
and
See
the
following
responses:
for
discussion
of
the
adequacy
of
existing
hazardous
materials
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR;
for
discussion
regarding
the
“Icehouse
District”
and
school
development
standards:
for
discussion
regarding
location
of
schools
within
¼
mile
of
the
Kinder
Morgan
tank
farm;
and
5
for
discussion
regarding
compliance
with
the
law
as
mitigation
under
CEQA.
See
See
See
See
for
discussion
of
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
See
for
discussion
of
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
See
for
discussion
of
the
adequacy
of
existing
studies
for
use
in
the
Draft
EIR.
The
text
cited
in
this
comment
refers
to
berm
containing
flood
flows
within
the
Levinson
Overflow
area.
The
maximum
elevation
of
flood
flows
detained
within
the
overflow
area
is
determined
by
the
height
of
the
weir
and
the
berm
forming
the
overflow
area;
the
elevation
of
flooding
in
the
event
of
failure
of
that
berm
during
a
100-year
storm
event
is
not
related
to
sea
level
rise.
Coastal
flood
zones
include
factors
that
consider
such
effects
as
wave
heights
and
high
tides.
Establishing
a
requirement
to
provide
one
foot
of
additional
height
(also
known
as
freeboard)
above
the
100-year
flood
zone
elevation
is
commonly
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-97
May
2015