2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
impact
site
improvements.
Treadwell
&
Rollo
recommends
additional
geotechnical
surveys
be
conducted
prior
to
final
design
and
construction.
See
Master Response 18
for
discussion
of
“cross
-
contamination.”
OSEC-217
[See page
5-335 for the original comment]
This
comment
expresses
a
general
opinion
about
site
investigations
that
have
occurred
over
the
past
35
years,
and
states
that
specific
comments
will
be
provided
later
in
the
comment
letter.
[See page
5-335 for the original comment]
See
Responses
BBCAG-112,
BBCAG-113,
and
BBCAG-113.
Title
27
closure
of
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill
will
be
required
to
prevent
any
increases
in
leachate
that
exceed
any
regulatory
thresholds.
[See page
5-335 for the original comment]
See
Response BBCAG-176.
[See page
5-337 for the original comment]
See
Response BBCAG-177.
[See page
5-337 for the original comment]
Human
contact
with
the
surface
water
within
the
Lagoon
would
not
be
permitted
pursuant
to
the
Biological
Resources
mitigation
measures
set
forth
in
the
Draft
EIR.
The
water
quality
of
the
Lagoon
will
be
improved
once
the
Baylands
Project
site
is
remediated
and
best
management
practices
are
in
place
for
stormwater
pollution
and
prevention.
CEQA
does
not
require,
nor
does
the
City
have
the
authority
to
require,
mitigation
measures
for
impacts
not
created
by
the
Project,
such
as
existing
water
quality
in
the
Lagoon.
[See page
5-337 for the original comment]
As
shown
in
Draft
EIR
Figure
3-6,
the
Bayshore
Industrial
Park,
areas
adjacent
to
the
machinery
and
equipment
building,
and
Icehouse
Hill
are
within
OU-2
and
therefore
subject
to
the
regulatory
authority
of
the
RWQCB.
To
address
issues
related
to
previous
uses
within
the
Bayshore
Industrial
Park,
text
has
been
added
following
the
conclusion
at
the
bottom
of
page
4.G-98
as
shown
in
Final
EIR
Chapter
3.0.
[See page
5-337 for the original comment]
As
discussed
in
Master Response 13
and
required
by
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-2a,
completion
of
Title
27
landfill
closure
activities
will
be
required
prior
to
any
development
within
the
former
land
fill
area,
completion
of
remediation
for
OU-1
will
be
required
prior
to
any
development
within
OU-1,
and
completion
of
remediation
for
OU-2
will
be
required
prior
to
any
development
within
OU-2.
Remediation
of
each
area
will
be
compliant
with
OSHA
and
Cal/OSHA
requirements
to
protect
workers,
and
will
also
be
required
not
to
create
any
new
exposure
pathways
that
could
adversely
affect
human
health
or
the
environment.
OSEC-218
OSEC-219
OSEC-220
OSEC-221
OSEC-222
OSEC-223
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.3-76
May
2015
Previous Page | Next Page