2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
closure
will
be
conducted
in
light
of
the
land
uses
approved
by
the
City
for
the
Baylands,
including
the
former
landfill
area.
Land
uses
proposed
within
the
former
landfill
area
will
be
required
to
be
designed
and
constructed
in
compliance
with
Title
27
requirements.
See
for
discussion
regarding
the
landfill
closure
review
and
approval
process.
See
for
discussion
regarding
the
characterization
of
contamination
within
the
Project
site.
Characterization
of
wastes
within
the
Project
site
is
based
on
studies
of
actual
landfill
wastes,
while
characterization
of
soils
contamination
is
based
on
soils
testing.
Thus,
descriptions
of
landfill
wastes
and
soils
contamination
are
not
dependent
on
identification
of
specific
past
uses
within
the
Baylands
Project
Site.
See
Response
See
The
former
Brisbane
Landfill
received
waste
streams
from
1932
to
1967,
prior
to
the
classification
of
wastes
as
hazardous
or
nonhazardous;
prior
to
the
segregation
of
waste
streams;
and
prior
to
the
identification
of
landfills
as
Class
I,
II,
or
III.
Based
on
records
of
the
waste
placed
in
the
former
Brisbane
Landfill,
the
waste
stream
has
been
classified
as
“primarily
nonhazardous”
as
the
landfill
was
used
primarily
for
municipal
waste.
See
for
discussion
regarding
the
characterization
of
contamination
within
the
Project
site.
Characterization
of
wastes
within
the
Project
site
is
based
on
studies
of
actual
landfill
wastes,
while
characterization
of
soils
contamination
is
based
on
soils
testing.
Descriptions
of
the
contaminants
within
the
former
landfill
and
former
railyard
are
presented
in
Draft
EIR
Section
4.G,
Hazards
and
Hazardous
Materials
,
starting
on
page
4.G-23.
See
for
discussion
regarding
the
remediation
review
and
approval
process.
EIR
Mitigation
Measure
4.G-2a
requires
completion
of
Title
27
landfill
closure
plans
prior
to
development
within
the
former
landfill
area,
completion
of
the
remedial
action
plan
for
prior
to
development
within
and
completion
of
the
remedial
action
plan
for
prior
to
development
within
“Failure”
in
the
context
of
Section
4.E-4
(page
4.E-41
and
4.E-42)
is
used
to
describe
soil
stability
when
additional
loads,
or
weight,
have
been
placed,
and
not
permeability.
Both
GeoSyntec
(2008)
and
Treadwell
&
Rollo,
Inc.
(2008)
determined
if
constructed
slopes
were
not
engineered
appropriately
they
could
slide
(fail)
and
potentially
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.3-75
May
2015