3.
Revisions
to
the
Text
of
the
Draft
EIR
Page
4.G-101
[See
page
for
the
original
comment]
REVISE
the
conclusions
to
read
as
follows:
Conclusion:
This
impact
would
be
significant,
and
implementation
of
Mitigation
Measures
4.G-12a
and
4.G-12b
is
recommended
under
all
four
proposed
development
scenarios.
Conclusion
with
Mitigation:
With
the
inclusion
of
Mitigation
Measures
4.G-12a
and
4.G-12b
,
impacts
related
to
being
located
on
a
hazardous
materials
site
pursuant
to
Government
Code
Section
65962.5
under
any
of
the
scenarios
would
be
reduced
to
a
less-than-significant
level.
Surface
Water
Hydrology
and
Water
Quality
Page
4.H-1
[See
page
for
the
original
comment]
REVISE
the
final
paragraph
on
page
4.H-1
to
read
as
follows:
Historically,
the
Project
Site,
commonly
known
as
the
Brisbane
Baylands,
was
part
of
an
estuarine
ecosystem
through
which
upland
drainage
flowed
into
tidal
marshes
and
mudflats
before
reaching
deeper
waters
of
San
Francisco
Bay.
The
Project
Site
is
located
within
the
Visitacion-Guadalupe
Valley
Watershed,
which
topographically
appears
as
a
large
cove
or
generally
consists
of
a
bowl
straddling
the
San
Francisco/
and
San
Mateo
County
line
Counties.
The
watershed
drains
the
area
bounded
by
Bayview
Hill,
McLaren
Ridge,
and
San
Bruno
Mountain.
The
two
main
drainages
of
the
watershed
are
Visitacion
Creek
and
Guadalupe
Creek,
which
originate
in
the
upland
areas
to
the
west
and
drain
toward
San
Francisco
Bay.
Visitacion
Valley
has
been
divided
into
two
unnamed
subwatersheds
due
to
the
fact
that
the
northern
portion
is
pumped
northward
into
the
San
Francisco
combined
sanitary/stormwater
sewer
system.
The
southern
portion,
which
includes
Visitacion
Creek,
drains
by
gravity
to
San
Francisco
Bay,
but
much
of
it
is
channelized.
Guadalupe
Creek
also
drains
by
gravity
to
the
Bay
via
Brisbane
Lagoon.
Page
4.H-2
[See
page
for
the
original
comment]
DELETE
text
from
the
last
sentence
on
this
page
as
follows:
Figure
4.H-2
illustrates
existing
land
uses
and
the
subwatershed
boundaries
from
the
City’s
Storm
Drainage
Master
Plan.
Page
4.H-3
REPLACE
Figure
4.H-1
with
revised
which
follows
this
page,
to
eliminate
references
to
existing
land
uses
and
focus
on
watershed
boundaries.
REPLACE
F
igure
4.H-3
with
revised
which
follows
this
page,
to
indicate
updated
FEMA
flood
hazard
mapping.
Page
4.H-6
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
3-91
May
2015