Page 4.M-16   BCC-528 [See page 5-263 for the original comment] REVISE the last paragraph as follows:

This 47-acre park would feature significant vegetative habitat areas (e.g., constructed wetlands, windrows and chaparral mounds) and open space connected by a network of trails.

Page 4.M-18   BCC-533 [See page 5-264 for the original comment] REVISE the last paragraph as follows:

Group Use Area

The Group Use Area would be located immediately north of Icehouse Hill. The recreational component of this area would be primarily oriented toward organized groups. A concessionaire agreement would be established with the City in order to provide a source of revenue generation that would help support the public space. Picnic and recreational activity services would be oriented to accommodate corporate picnics and business retreats, as well as large family celebrations and events. This type of operation would provide food services and barbeques and recreational opportunities such as softball/baseball, volleyball, horseshoes, bocce ball, tetherball, croquet, and other group and family-oriented outdoor activities.

Page 4.M-20   BCC-535 [See page 5-264 for the original comment] REVISE the first full paragraph on page 4.M-20 as follows:

The Quimby Act (California Government Code Section 66477) authorizes cities to require the dedication of land or payment of fees for park or recreational purposes by ordinance and establishes a standard of 3 to

5 acres of parkland dedication per 1,000 residents, depending on the amount of existing parkland within a jurisdiction. Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the City adopted an implementing ordinance in 1982 (Ordinance 282, contained in Sections 16.24.010-16.24.070 of the Municipal Code) that was amended in 2013 by Ordinance 566 to authorizinged the City to require Quimby Act dedications to “provide for adequate and appropriate recreational facilities,” defining the amount of land needed by setting a standard of 4.5 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The dedication requirements of Chapter 16.24 thus reflect the threshold at which new development could cause physical impacts on existing recreational facilities and is therefore used as the significance criterion for impacts on recreational resources. Thus, a standard of 4.5 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents was used to determine whether a significant impact would result.

Page 4.M-20   BCC-535 [See page 5-264 for the original comment] REVISE the last paragraph on page 4.M-20, continuing onto page 4.M-21 as follows: