Significant Impact Being Mitigated |
Mitigation Measure |
Responsibility for Implementation |
Enforcement Responsibility |
Monitoring Responsibility/ Frequency |
Actions Indicating Compliance |
Traffic and Circulation (cont.) |
|||||
Impacts to freeway |
4.N-4: The City of Brisbane, as part of the Geneva |
City of Brisbane City |
The City Engineer shall |
The City Engineer shall |
Issuance of building permits |
mainline segments |
Avenue extension project, shall account for existing |
Engineer |
provide updated information |
review any updates to the |
following payment of |
under Cumulative |
traffic, background traffic growth, and the most recent |
on the approved buildout of |
Bi-County Transportation |
applicable mitigation and |
|
plus Project |
forecasts of traffic expected to be associated with each |
the Baylands to the SFCTA, |
Study effort to ensure that |
fair share funding |
|
conditions. |
of several adjacent development projects, including |
SFMTA, and Caltrans to |
updated information on the |
requirements for Bi-County |
|
DSP, DSP-V, CPP, & CPP-V scenarios |
development of the Project Site. Brisbane shall work with the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) and San Francisco Municipal Transportation |
ensure that projected traffic volumes are accounted for in the design of the Geneva |
approved buildout of the Baylands is reflected in the update. |
Transportation Study improvements. |
|
Agency (SFMTA) to ensure projected traffic volumes are |
Avenue & US 101 SB |
||||
accounted for in the design of the Geneva Avenue |
Ramps intersection as part |
||||
Extension. |
of the Geneva Avenue |
||||
Mitigation measures and associated fair-share funding |
extension. |
||||
measures for cumulative regional roadway system |
Once mitigation and fair |
||||
impacts, including freeway segment impacts, will be |
share funding requirements |
||||
formulated through the current inter-jurisdictional Bi- |
are established, the City |
||||
County Transportation Study update effort being led by |
Engineer shall include such |
||||
the SFCTA. Development within the Project Site shall |
requirements as conditions |
||||
contribute its fair share to the Geneva Avenue extension |
of approval for site-specific |
||||
project, based upon the SF-CHAMP model or such |
development. |
||||
other model used by the SFCTA in the Bi-County Study. |
|||||
If the Bi-County Study is terminated prior to identification |
|||||
of required mitigations and adoption of fair share funding |
|||||
obligations, the City and County of San Francisco, the |
|||||
SFCTA, and the City of Brisbane shall meet and confer |
|||||
to establish an alternative method for determination of |
|||||
the respective fair shares of project costs, including |
|||||
amounts to be contributed by Project Site development, |
|||||
using the SF-CHAMP model or such other model |
|||||
agreed upon by the agencies. |
|||||
See also Mitigation Measure 4.N-13. |
|||||
Traffic generated by |
4.N-5: Prior to issuance of building occupancy permits |
The arena operator shall |
City of Brisbane City |
The City Engineer shall |
Issuance of certificates of |
a sold out weekday |
for the arena, the operator shall develop and submit to |
prepare the required |
Engineer |
review the proposed |
occupancy following |
evening arena event. |
the City a Transportation Management Plan for |
Transportation Management |
Transportation |
approval of the required |
|
DSP-V scenario |
deploying traffic control officers in the Project Site vicinity to increase efficiency of pre- and post-event traffic, and |
Plan, and submit the plan to the Brisbane City Engineer, |
Management Plan and require any needed |
Transportation Management Plan. |
|
for developing incentives to increase transit ridership to |
Brisbane Police |
modifications to the plan. |
|||
the arena, such as parking pricing policies, customer |
Department, SFMTA, and |
The City Engineer shall |
|||
information strategies, and/or ticket/other related |
the San Francisco Police |
also confirm approval of the |
|||
discounts with proof of payment for transit. |
Department for review and |
final plan by the Brisbane |
|||
Implementation of this plan shall be designed to speed |
approval. |
and San Francisco police |
|||