2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
mitigation
measures
within
Daly
City
or
San
Francisco.
These
impacts
are
thus
identified
in
the
Draft
EIR
as
being
“significant
and
unavoidable.”
Since
mitigation
measures
are
required
to
be
implemented
as
the
need
for
such
measures
arise,
there
is
not
a
20
year
or
more
“lag
time”
between
the
creation
of
a
significant
impact
and
the
implementation
of
mitigation
measures,
as
is
implied
in
this
comment.
The
comment
mischaracterizes
the
chart
on
page
4.N-150.
The
chart
matches
the
conclusion
for
Impact
4.N-16,
which
is
that
the
impact
would
be
less
than
significant
(i.e.,
each
of
the
four
Project
Site
development
scenarios
would
include
the
construction
of
new
roadways
to
facilitate
emergency
access
to
locations
within
the
Baylands
site,
and
existing
emergency
response
routes
in
the
vicinity
of
the
Baylands
site
would
either
be
maintained
as
is
or
rerouted
as
necessary).
The
availability
of
adequate
access
for
each
stage
of
development
would
be
a
requirement
of
construction
management
plans
prepared
pursuant
to
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-12.
The
comment
requests
additional
study
regarding
site
ingress/egress
points
without
identifying
a
specific
purpose.
The
Draft
EIR
states
on
page
4.N-150,
“As
described
in
Section
4.L,
Public
Services
,
each
development
scenario
includes
a
circulation
plan
designed
to
ensure
appropriate
emergency
access
to
and
from
the
Baylands
site
and
to
provide
access
to
all
development
areas
through
the
above-cited
new
roadways
(specifically
to
facilitate
North
County
Fire
Authority’s
emergency
response
within
the
Baylands).”
Kinder
Morgan
is
an
existing
use
whose
operations
are
subject
to
a
federal,
state,
and
local
requirements
to
ensure
public
safety.
See
for
discussion
regarding
the
land
use
compatibility
between
proposed
uses
within
the
Baylands
and
the
Kinder
Morgan
tank
farm.
See
Comment
Impact
4.N-17
and
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-17
address
loading
demand
during
the
peak
hour
of
loading
activities.
A
significant
impact
would
occur
if
such
loading
activities
could
not
be
“accommodated
within
proposed
onsite
loading
facilities
or
within
convenient
on-street
loading
zones,
creating
potentially
hazardous
conditions
or
significant
delays
affecting
traffic,
transit,
bicycles,
or
pedestrians.”
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-17
would
avoid
impacts
related
to
onsite
truck
loading
activities,
and
ensure
that
such
activities
do
not
spill
out
into
areas
not
intended
for
truck
loading.
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-202
May
2015