2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
The
proposed
development
being
analyzed
includes
concept
plan
and
General
Plan
level
information
for
all
four
scenarios
and
specific
plan
level
information
regarding
development
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios.
No
site-specific
development
projects
have
been
proposed,
nor
have
any
specific
tenants
for
onsite
development
been
identified
with
the
exception
of
Recology
modernization
and
expansion
in
the
CPP-V
scenario.
Because
the
types
of
businesses
that
would
be
permitted
under
each
scenario
are
known,
reasonable
assumptions
regarding
the
truck
loading
demands
for
these
types
of
businesses
were
made
and
evaluated.
See
for
more
discussion
regarding
analysis
of
truck
loading
impacts.
Mitigation
Measure
4.N-17
addresses
the
supply
of
truck
loading
spaces.
It
does
not
address
the
traffic
impacts
created
by
trucks,
which
is
captured
in
the
traffic
impact
analysis
(as
a
percentage
of
overall
vehicular
traffic).
See
for
discussion
on
determination
of
parking
supply
for
project-specific
developments.
Roadway
operations
analyzed
in
the
Draft
EIR
include
delivery
vehicles.
The
draft
EIR
specifically
states
on
page
that
the
proposed
water
supply
agreement
“is
being
considered
as
an
independent
component
of
the
Project
Site
development
and
could
be
approved
or
not
regardless
of
any
action
taken
by
the
City
to
approve,
modify,
or
not
approve
any
of
the
proposed
Concept
Plans
or
the
Specific
Plan
proposed
by
UPC”
for
the
DSP
and
DSP-V
scenarios.
The
existence
of
water
mains
does
not
affect
calculation
of
the
supply
of
water
to
a
project
site.
The
proposed
water
supply
for
the
Brisbane
Baylands
is
from
the
Oakdale
Irrigation
District,
as
described
in
Section
3.10
of
the
Draft
EIR.
The
existing
Recology
site,
a
portion
of
which
is
located
within
San
Francisco,
will
continue
to
receive
water
from
the
SFPUC.
Discussion
of
Impact
beginning
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.O-47
addresses
whether
proposed
Baylands
development
would
result
in
the
construction
of
new
water,
wastewater
treatment,
and/or
stormwater
drainage
facilities
or
expansion
of
existing
facilities
that
could
cause
significant
environmental
effects.
The
mitigation
measures
needed
to
avoid
or
reduce
the
severity
of
the
physical
impacts
of
new
or
expanded
facilities
are
identified
on
Draft
EIR
pages
4.O-50
and
4.O-52.
In
relation
to
water
storage,
the
text
on
Draft
EIR
pages
4.O-47
and
48
acknowledges
that
all
four
scenarios
would
require
construction
of
new
or
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.2-203
May
2015