2.
Response
to
Comments
2.9
Individual
Responses
to
Comments
from
Organizations
This
comment
introduces
an
online
public
petition
created
by
the
Candlestick
Preservation
Association,
and
does
not
raise
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
This
comment
presents
the
contents
of
the
online
public
petition
created
by
the
Candlestick
Preservation
Association,
and
does
not
raise
significant
environmental
issues
regarding
the
adequacy
of
the
Draft
EIR
or
its
analyses
and
conclusions.
The
petition
will
be
considered
by
the
City
as
part
of
its
planning
review
for
the
Baylands.
Impacts
of
Baylands
Project
Site
development
on
air
quality
are
identified
starting
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.B-20.
Impacts
of
Project
Site
development
on
the
recreational
windsurfing
resource
are
identified
in
the
discussion
of
Impact
4.M-2
starting
on
Draft
EIR
page
4.M-22.
Discussion
of
the
water
area
evaluated
in
the
Draft
EIR
is
addressed
32.
Discussion
of
the
water
area
evaluated
in
the
Draft
EIR
is
addressed
See
for
discussion
of
the
significance
threshold
used
in
the
Draft
EIR.
See
for
a
discussion
of
the
significance
threshold
used
in
the
Draft
EIR.
See
for
a
discussion
of
the
significance
threshold
used
in
the
Draft
EIR.
See
33
for
a
discussion
of
the
alternative
wind
impact
analysis
proposed
by
the
CPA.
See
See
The
City
will
consider
the
comment
as
part
of
its
planning
review
and
decisionmaking.
This
comment
expresses
concurrence
with
Comments
through
for
which
responses
are
available
through
A
list
of
153
petitioners
who
electronically
signed
the
online
public
petition
created
by
the
Candlestick
Preservation
Association
is
provided
in
this
comment,
which
does
not
raise
Brisbane
Baylands
Final
EIR
2.9.4-27
May
2015