occupancy permits for any site-specific development that would (1) result in reducing the intersection to below the acceptable LOS standard, or (2) contribute additional traffic to the intersection if it is already operating below the acceptable LOS standard.
Page 4.N-122 Dettmer-19 [See page 5-541 for the original comment] REVISE Mitigation Measure 4.N-3f as follows.
Mitigation Measure 4.N-3f: The City of Brisbane shall work with the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA), San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority (SFMTA), and Caltrans to ensure that projected traffic volumes are accounted for in the design of the Geneva Avenue & US 101 SB Ramps intersection as part of the Geneva Avenue extension project.
Mitigations and associated fair-share funding measures for cumulative regional roadway system impacts will be formulated through the current inter-jurisdictional Bi-County Transportation Study effort being led by the SFCTA. Development within the Project Site shall contribute its fair share to the Geneva Avenue & US 101 SB Ramps intersection and improvements.
The extension of Geneva Avenue from Bayshore Boulevard to the US 101 freeway and reconfiguration of the US 101 Candlestick interchange shall be constructed and accepted for public maintenance prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any site-specific development that would result in reducing the interchange to below the acceptable LOS standard.
Page 4.N-122 Dettmer-19 [See page 5-541 for the original comment] REVISE the third paragraph as follows.
Conclusion with Mitigation: Iimplementation of the physical improvements associated with Mitigation Measure 4.N-3f is uncertain and outside of Brisbane’s jurisdiction because (1) environmental review of the interchange project is not yet complete, (2) the final Project Study Report has yet to be approved for the interchange, (3) the mitigation measure requires coordination with and action by the SFCTA, and (4) the interchange requires approval by Caltrans and is currently unfunded. Thus, While although provision of the physical improvements called for in the Bi-County study the proposed mitigation measure would improve operating conditions at the intersection to an acceptable LOS C in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour, the funding and timing of such improvements cannot be ensured. Mitigation Measure 4.N-3f would limit the amount of Baylands development prior to availability of improvements proposed in the B-County study and thereby ensure that Project Site development’s contributions to significant cumulative traffic impacts would be less than remain significant and unavoidable.